Cryptocurrency-funded groups called DAOs are becoming charities – here are some issues to watch

As cryptocurrency becomes more popular in the US, Sean Stein Smith highlights several considerations that donors and charities should keep in mind as these arrangements emerge.

Cryptocurrency is becoming a more familiar way to pay for things.

One option is as part of a crowd, through a decentralised autonomous organisation. In this relatively new kind of group, also called a DAO, decisions and choices are governed by holders of one kind of cryptocurrency token, such as ethereum or bitcoin. DAOs also use “smart contracts” that make decisions through online votes by all participants who wish to weigh in and other forms of automation.

DAOs are essentially clubs that harness both crowdfunding and cryptocurrency to operate in arenas from art to sports. They are also cropping up in philanthropy.

One good example is the Big Green DAO. Launched in late 2021, it’s tied to a decade-old food justice charity that had revenue in excess of US$9 million in 2019.

Big Green’s founder is Kimbal Musk, who is Elon Musk’s brother and a member of Tesla’s board. The DAO version of his not for profit promises to “disrupt philanthropic hierarchies” by reducing overhead spending and shaving other expenses.

In the past month alone, $1.7M in #EndaomentGrants was distributed to #nonprofits. 💸 #nDAOGivingRecap (2/3) pic.twitter.com/CJBPYqLhCB

— endaoment.eth 👉 ETHDenver (@endaomentdotorg) February 1, 2022

New terrain

Based on my research regarding crypto-assets, I believe that there are several considerations that donors and charities should keep in mind as these arrangements emerge.

First, DAOs have little if any formal infrastructure. Some states simply require one individual to be designated as the agent of record. Wyoming passed a law in 2021 – the first of its kind in the United States – that legally recognises DAOs as legal entities. It still requires the DAO to be organised as a Wyoming-based limited liability company, with an individual identified as the registered agent.

In theory, at least, when combined with the quick nature of how DAO decisions are made, this means that not for profits can achieve more and respond more quickly to changing circumstances, while spending less on administrative staff and other kinds of overhead.

Legal questions

Until now, most cryptocurrency donations to charities simply provided capital to eligible organisations that operate like any other standard not for profit.

For tax purposes, donating cryptocurrency is like giving away stocks, bonds or other property, rather than donating money. This means, typically, that cryptocurrency donations actually provide donors with a larger tax benefit versus cash donations. If a donor were to instead liquidate their cryptocurrency prior to making a gift, they would first have to pay capital gains taxes, and they would have less money to give away.

However, it’s unclear whether funds can legally flow to, through and out of a charitable decentralised autonomous organisation.

Not for profits are subject to regulatory enforcement and need to be chartered in a particular state. So far, it’s unclear how regulators, such as the Internal Revenue Service or state charity offices, will be able to monitor or audit these groups.

It’s also unclear whether the very nature of DAOs is compatible with charitable donations.

In most, if not all, instances of for-profit DAOs – or even DAOs organised for a specific one-time purpose, such as attempting to purchase an original copy of the U.S. Constitution – cash or appreciated property that is contributed to the organisation is exchanged for governance tokens. The tokens essentially represent a fractional form of collective ownership.

This could be problematic. When donors make charitable contributions, they relinquish the money or asset they just gave to the charity. A basic condition for having a donation be eligible for favourable tax treatment by the authorities is that the donor gets nothing of value in return.

The authorities may eventually determine that the distribution of virtual tokens to donors, even if those tokens aren’t used for anything outside the scope of the nonprofit, violates this precondition.

Wild rides

The clearest risk with those gifts is probably their volatility.

Overall, the cryptocurrency’s total market value sank to $1.6 trillion on 3 February 2022, down from $2.85 trillion three months earlier.

Charities either need to convert these donations into U.S. dollars right away, as they do with donated stocks, or gamble regarding their future value.

Despite all the operational, financial and legal obstacles nonprofit DAOs face, I’m excited about the opportunities with these crowd-managed charities funded by cryptocurrency donations because of their potential for a high degree of transparency paired with low overhead.

About the author: Sean Stein Smith is assistant professor of economics and business at Lehman College, CUNY

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.