Close Search
 
MEDIA, JOBS & RESOURCES for the COMMON GOOD

Get more stories like this

FREE SOCIAL
SECTOR NEWS

2 comments

  • Simple as that.

    Community enterprise belongs to the collective commons as much as Social Enterprise.

    How is it that Bendigo Bank think they have the right to own this term.

    And when might there be a legal challenge from them to someone using it… or someone using it to them?

    http://www.bendigobank.com.au/public/community/community_enterprise_foundation.asp

  • Anonymous says:

    At the end of the day the title of ‘social enterprise’ means little, other than to describe a specific set of activities. The term itself is relatively modern; while social agencies have been engaged in social enterprise for most of the past 100 or so years. More important than a title, is the outcome and impact our sector achieves through its ‘business-like, non-social service delivery.’ Yet it is a generic term and should remain so. It’s worth fighting for. Can one imagine the problems we would have if someone claimed ownership of the term, ‘management.’? At the same time I can’t help wondering how much of the sectors outrage is just the standard reaction to anything the corporate sector does that impinges on our sacred ground! Someone stole the name for ugg boots, so we simply rebranded them and everyone continues to refer to them as ugg boots.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Balancing the tension of social purpose and commercial viability

Felicity Green

Wednesday, 29th March 2023 at 12:35 pm

Social enterprise sector failing Indigenous businesses

Ruby Kraner-Tucci

Monday, 20th March 2023 at 2:37 pm

Using community power to drive EV uptake

Danielle Kutchel

Monday, 20th March 2023 at 10:35 am

Social enterprise: What’s in a name?

Tara Anderson

Wednesday, 1st February 2023 at 5:33 pm

pba inverse logo
Subscribe Twitter Facebook
×